Ya know,

I just reread my last post, after reading your last post, then my original post again.

You're exactly right.

My first post responding to yours was accusatory, disproportionately technical given the reality of how things occurred as a function of time during a process not originally planned to be documented, and pretty damn righteous holier than thou. And to top that off, I even misinterpreted what you had written.

I'm sorry for my behavior. No excuses.

The one thing that puzzles me is why someone offended by such a rude response seems to continuously invoke antagonistic sarcasm, as if that will somehow increase the likelihood of a particular point being agreed with.

People sometimes do it out of frustration. I am not immune. I get it.

But you seem to keep resorting almost exclusively to said method of communication. If anything, other people usually find such behavior dissuasive and in some cases abusive.

I'll work to be better with my manners If you work to be better with your conversational skills.

You do realize that if you did not, then you are arguably being a behavioral accusatory hypocrite, yes?

Reread the sentence, I did not call you one. There's a conditional statement at the beginning.

We both have work to do.

Your response will be most telling.